DISCOURSES ON
RADHASOAMI
FAITH
BY
MAHARAJ SAHAB
Pandit Brahm Sankar Misra,
M.A.
82. SUBJECTIVE
KNOWLEDGE IS NO ILLUSION
122.
The account we have given of the two eternal poles, of course, represents a
description at the contemptibly low plane of human intelligence. But if it be
contended that such a subjective representation does not portray the correct
condition, the rough sketch we have attempted to present becomes a matter of
problematical accuracy. It, therefore, behoves us, before proceeding further
with the subject, to remove the doubt introduced by the possible objection
indicated above. The theory which gives rise to the objection may be briefly
stated as follows. The knowledge of the creation, we see, is always obtained
from the subjective impressions it produces within us. In the absence of
subjective impressions, we know nothing of the creation. The impressions, in
question, constitute the effect, and the creation, which produces those
impressions, is the cause. Now, if we are aware of the effect, it does not
follow that we know the cause also. If, accordingly, all sentient entities who
receive the impressions were to disappear, the cause would remain, but the
effect would be gone, and there would be a state which would not be the state
of the effect. The knowledge of creation, as we possess, is, therefore, a
knowledge of the sentient entities and not an absolute knowledge.
123.
This story is irrefutable, if the assumption involved in it, viz, that sentient
entities alone possess the functions of subjective knowledge and that there is
nothing else in creation which possesses such functions, holds good. It will,
however, be seen from what we have stated previously (vide Articles 16 to 22),
that all sentient entities are emanations of various degrees from the infinite
spiritual source, the Supreme Being that the distinctive features of the
spirits, viz, intelligence, bliss, and energy are derived from His essence; and
that the frame a spirit-entity has created for itself has been built up on
lines similar to those employed for the evolution of creation, in other words,
the spirit-frame is a microcosm or an image of macrocosm. It is hardly
necessary to remark that the subjective functions, too, of a spirit are
infinitesimal image of the subjective or intelligent attribute of the Supreme
Being. The inference, therefore, is irresistible that the creation appears to
us substantially in the same form in which it appears to the Supreme Being; and
that alone is its correct form. Our subjective knowledge, if based on facts and
correct application of inductive reasoning, should not, therefore, even in the
abstract, be relegated to the category of illusions.
Very true. Subjectivity may differ from person to person. There are many views on cosmogenesis. The views expressed in the Discourses on Radhasoami Faith seems more close to the steady-state theory.
ReplyDeleteSar Bachan Poetry supports the idea of Big-Bang model of the visible universe.
ReplyDeleteSar Bachan Poetry supports the idea of Big-Bang model of the visible universe.
ReplyDelete