II. KARMAS AS EXPLAINED IN THE
VARIOUS WRITINGS AND SPEECHES OF REVERED LEADERS OF RADHASOAMI FAITH,
RADHASOAMI SATSANG, DAYALBAGH.
(Compiled by DR. PREM SARAN SATSANGI)
THE TRUTH ABOUT GOOD
DEEDS
(Discourse No. 32 from SATSANG
KE UPDESA, Part I by Param Guru Sahabji Maharaj)
People
in India
have believed in the Theory of Karma
from very ancient times. Several learned Europeans have recently given some
thought to this problem and obtained considerable peace of mind and, influenced
by their example, quite a large number of Europeans have also begun to believe
in the Karma philosophy. In India however
every child believes in the theory of ‘Karma’
and feels no difficulty whatsoever regarding his belief in this theory. But it
does not mean that everybody in India
is acquainted with all the intricacies of this difficult theory. On the
contrary Indians harbour many wrong notions about this theory due to their
ignorance. For example, everyone says that good actions bring happiness, ensure
God’s pleasure or lead to heaven, while evil actions bring pain and God’s
displeasure or lead to hell. It should be noted that no action in itself is
either good or bad. It is the motive of the doer that determines whether any
particular action is good or bad. For example, if a doctor amputates your
finger, it would be a good act because his motive in cutting off your finger is
to give you relief but the same act by an enemy or a dacoit would be an evil
act because his real motive is to give you pain or to injure you. It follows
from the above that good deeds are those that are inspired by good motives and
that it is the motive and not the action that counts. But it is not necessary
that all actions inspired by good motives should result in happiness. For
example, there is a story of a bear who with a view to give relief to his sleeping
man-friend struck him hard on the face because a fly sat on his friend’s face
again and again despite his best efforts to keep it off. The bear no doubt
killed the fly but sorely wounded the friend’s face by his claws. Many more
instances can be cited to show clearly that despite the best intentions, every
action does not necessarily result in happiness. Thus the principle that
actions inspired by good motives result in happiness, ensure the pleasure of
the True Supreme Being or lead to heaven, is proved to be wrong. If however the
principle is accepted as true, good deeds would have to be defined in some
other way. Merely good intentions will not make actions really good. For this
reason, it is said that good deeds are those which are performed in the discharge
of duties laid down for man by Rishis,
Sages, Sadhs, Saints and Prophets.
Obviously, if these duties are performed merely by way of custom or under
compulsion, they will bear no fruit. Thus the right principle for guidance
would be that man can attain happiness and pleasure of the True Supreme Being
and reach the Highest Abode if he performs his duties prescribed by the great
Seers and Spiritual Adepts for man in a spirit of faith and devotion and in
accordance with their instructions.